• About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
  • Research & Insights

The Influential Power of the Ethical Shopper

  • February 10, 2016
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

People don’t always make ethical decision when they make purchases.

Even when consumers know a brand’s sustainability and labor practices, they continue to make socially irresponsible decisions and may go as far as to criticize those who make responsible choices, according to new research from marketing scholar Daniel Zane and his colleagues.

Published in the October 2015 Journal of Consumer Behavior, these results come from a series of experiments that asked hundreds of participants to evaluate products like blue jeans and backpacks and the purchasing behavior of other consumers.

In each study, participants saw information on both the look of the products, as well as its ethical background. For example, some jeans were listed as sweatshop-free or being made of recycled materials, while others were not.

Some participants were told that due to time constraints, they would have to choose one attribute to review.

Then, participants were asked to take part in a fictional marketing study that had them evaluate the behavior of fake consumers who researched things like delivery time and ethical information before making a purchase. The participants rated what they thought about these customers based on traits such as “fashionable,” “odd” and “attractive.”

The researchers found that participants who chose to avoid the ethical information judged the consumers who conducted ethical research more harshly than those who ignored it.

However, in another study, participants changed their attitudes after given a “second chance” to behave ethically – the opportunity to donate to a charity – before evaluating the shoppers.

Consumers are unlikely to choose the ethical route every time they are faced with an ethical decision.

“Our results suggest that consumers do want to behave ethically and feel badly about not doing so when their failure is highlighted by the actions of ethical others,” according to the researchers.

Journal of Consumer Psychology

Researchers:
Daniel M. Zane and Rebecca Walker Reczek, Ohio State University
Julie R. Irwin, The University of Texas at Austin

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • CSR
  • Emotions
  • ethical consumer
  • frankology
  • humanrights
  • information avoidance
Previous Article
  • Research & Insights

Increase Humanitarianism with Sadness

  • February 8, 2016
View Post
Next Article
  • Research & Insights

When it Comes to Climate Change Seeing is Believing and Feeling.

  • February 15, 2016
View Post
Professional Development
  • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
  • Science Communications Course 
More of our work
  • The Secret to Better Storytelling for Social Change: Better Partnerships
  • How We Are Making Sure The Science We Share Is Good
  • Things I learned from YouTube stars, ex-extremists, and storytellers about fighting hate
  • Communicating the Complexity of Displacement in a Changing Climate
Latest from the Center
  • Most Americans Support Freedom of Information. Almost None Have Ever Used It.
  • October 2025 nationwide survey sheds light on Americans’ increasing worry about housing affordability
  • 2025 ‘Real Good Census’ Reveals a Strategically Vital Field with Strong Rewards, Marking Significant Growth
  • composite image of Audrey Goldfarb and text stating "Science isn't personal: why communicating emotion isn't 'soft,' it's strategic"
    Changemakers in Action: Dr. Audrey Goldfarb
How We Help – Case Studies
  • BROKE project screenshot
    Re-examining narratives on poverty and wealth — the BROKE project
  • Staff professional development via ‘drip’ training integrated in Slack
  • illustration
    Innovation Service of UNHCR: the UN Refugee Agency
UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2026

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.