• About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
  • Research & Insights

Increase Humanitarianism with Sadness

  • February 8, 2016
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

Many are searching for ways to boost support for those overseas who are suffering from the outbreaks of infectious diseases.

Communications scholar Janet Yang from the University of Buffalo found that evoking feelings of sadness can increase support for countries plagued by infectious diseases, like ebola. The findings were published in the December 2015 issue of Risk Analysis.

In the study, about a thousand participants were asked a series of questions to measure their existing knowledge of the crisis, how important they saw the issue, their personal worldviews and how much of a threat they believe Ebola was to the United States.

Then, participants read one of two altered newspaper articles about the 2014 Ebola crisis in West Africa. The articles were based on an article that appeared in the New York Times, but were modified to make the Ebola threat seem either close to home or far away.

After reading the articles, participants recorded their emotions, such as sadness, anger and fear, as well as whether they would be supportive of a friend or family member if he or she wanted to go to West Africa to help with the outbreak.

When participants reported sadness, they said they were more likely to support friends and family travelling to combat Ebola. Yang suggests this could be due to an increase in empathy toward the people suffering.

While fear did not impact participant support, those who reported feeling angry were less likely to support a friend or family member going to West Africa.

“Anger often results from unfair actions performed by others that lead individuals to feel reactant and antagonistic,” Yang notes. “Participants who felt angry might blame the lack of effective responses from international health organizations during the early days of the Ebola outbreak and attribute the responsibility to dealing with the crisis to them.”

Messages that highlight “vulnerable populations such as children, praise the heroic act of helping those in need, or emphasize the importance of solving a problem at its origin might be more effective than messages that depict the dire situations in West Africa, its lack of basic infrastructure, and the daunting death toll to date,” Yang said.

Risk Analysis

Researcher:
Janet Yang, University at Buffalo

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • Charity
  • disease
  • Emotions
  • frankology
  • health
Previous Article
  • Research & Insights

Media Depictions of Muslims Divide Us

  • February 3, 2016
View Post
Next Article
  • Research & Insights

The Influential Power of the Ethical Shopper

  • February 10, 2016
View Post
Professional Development
  • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • Science Communications Course 
  • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
More of our work
  • The Secret to Better Storytelling for Social Change: Better Partnerships
  • Why each side of the partisan divide thinks the other is living in an alternate reality
  • The Science of What Makes People Care
  • Communicating the Complexity of Displacement in a Changing Climate
Latest from the Center
  • Most Americans Support Freedom of Information. Almost None Have Ever Used It.
  • October 2025 nationwide survey sheds light on Americans’ increasing worry about housing affordability
  • 2025 ‘Real Good Census’ Reveals a Strategically Vital Field with Strong Rewards, Marking Significant Growth
  • composite image of Audrey Goldfarb and text stating "Science isn't personal: why communicating emotion isn't 'soft,' it's strategic"
    Changemakers in Action: Dr. Audrey Goldfarb
How We Help – Case Studies
  • illustration of hand holding United States flag
    Covering immigration in local news—an exploration by Define American
  • gloved hand holding vial
    Science-based communication strategy on COVID for the UN Verified Initiative
  • hands with medicine
    Invest in Trust – a vaccine communications guide for CNAs
UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2026

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.