• About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
  • Research & Insights

Not So Cool: Conservative White Men Are More Likely to Deny Climate Change

  • June 3, 2015
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

If the term “climate change denier” conjures up an image for you of a conservative, white male, you may not be simply falling for a stereotype. Research by sociologists Aaron McCright and Riley Dunlap, published in the journal Global Environmental Change, suggests that conservative white males are actually more likely than others to question the scientific consensus on climate change.

Their findings are based on a study of public opinion data from 10 years of Gallup surveys.

McCright and Dunlap tracked the responses of conservative white men to a series of five questions about climate change. Respondents were asked questions about climate science (such as whether they believe that climate chance is “primarily due to human activities”), their belief in the scientific consensus on climate change, and their level of personal concern about climate change (such as how much they “worry about global warming”). The researchers also examined respondents’ answers to a question about “how well they understand the issue of global warming.”

They found that conservative white men do indeed deny climate change more than the general public taken as a whole. For instance, “while 29.6% of conservative white males believe that the effects of global warming will never happen, only 7.4% of all other adults believe so,” the authors write. Conservative white men are also more likely to deny the scientific consensus that human activity is causing climate change, and to believe that the media is exaggerating the effects of climate change.

Conservative white men were also more likely than other adults to report that they understand the issue of climate change, despite the fact that their views are not supported by science. McCright and Dunlap suggest that this over-confidence may come from an increased belief in technology, as well as from a desire to protect the current economic system from what they see as unnecessary changes.

“[C]onservative white males have disproportionately occupied positions of power within our economic system,” they explain. “Given the expansive capitalist economic challenge that climate change poses to the industrial capitalist society, it should not be surprising that conservative white males’ strong system-justifying attitudes would be triggered to deny climate change.”

Importantly, these beliefs may “lead [conservative white men] to reject information from groups (e.g. liberals and environmentalists) they see as threatening the economic system.” This suspicion of outside advocates, combined with conservative white men’s belief that they already understand climate change, means that communicators have their work cut out for them.

Global Environmental Change 

Researchers:
Aaron M. McCright, Michigan State University
Riley E. Dunlap, Oklahoma State University

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • frankology
Previous Article
  • Research & Insights

Use the Right Emotion for the Right Ask

  • May 29, 2015
View Post
Next Article
  • Research & Insights

The Tree Huggers Got It Right: The Link Between Compassion and Conservation

  • June 8, 2015
View Post
Professional Development
  • Science Communications Course 
  • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
More of our work
  • Philanthropy's New Voice: Building Trust with Deeper Stories and Clear Language
    Philanthropy’s Messaging Creates Confusion. Telling Better Stories Can Build Trust
  • BROKE project screenshot
    Re-examining narratives on poverty and wealth — the BROKE project
  • The Secret to Better Storytelling for Social Change: Better Partnerships
  • Can #MeToo Have Lasting Influence?
Latest from the Center
  • Most Americans Support Freedom of Information. Almost None Have Ever Used It.
  • October 2025 nationwide survey sheds light on Americans’ increasing worry about housing affordability
  • 2025 ‘Real Good Census’ Reveals a Strategically Vital Field with Strong Rewards, Marking Significant Growth
  • composite image of Audrey Goldfarb and text stating "Science isn't personal: why communicating emotion isn't 'soft,' it's strategic"
    Changemakers in Action: Dr. Audrey Goldfarb
How We Help – Case Studies
  • hands with medicine
    Invest in Trust – a vaccine communications guide for CNAs
  • gloved hand holding vial
    Science-based communication strategy on COVID for the UN Verified Initiative
  • UpTogether - Case Study - The Center for Public Interest Communications
    Using Research to Change Narratives About Direct Cash Assistance for UpTogether
UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2026

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.