• About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
  • Research & Insights

Been There, Done That: Sometimes Experience Makes Us Less Empathetic

  • November 16, 2015
  • 3 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

A study from Northwestern University and Georgetown University challenges the assumption that people who have successfully overcome setbacks – such as unemployment or bullying – are more sympathetic to those who are still struggling than individuals who haven’t experienced hard times themselves.

Researchers Rachel L. Ruttan, Loran F. Nordgren and Mary-Hunter McDonnell designed a series of experiments to see whether having experienced challenging situations would make people more compassionate toward others currently dealing with the same problems.

It turns out that people who have successfully dealt with challenges in the past are more compassionate to those currently undergoing them – but only in instances when those currently suffering are also successful in fighting through. The results of the study were published in the April 2015 issue of the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

In one experiment, 227 participants were asked to read a vignette about an unemployed man. The man was very motivated and sent out many job applications but was unsuccessful at finding a position. After struggling financially and not receiving any job offers, the man took up a friend’s offer to sell small amounts of illegal drugs to make ends meet.

Next participants were surveyed on how compassionate they felt toward the man in the story, answering questions such as, “When you think about [him], to what extent do you feel compassion?” and “When you think about [him], to what extent do you feel sympathy?” Participants also gave their overall evaluation of the man (good or bad, like or dislike, etc.) and how difficult they felt it was to overcome unemployment. The experiment was designed so that some of the participants had been unemployed in the past, some were unemployed at the time and some had never been unemployed.

The researchers found that participants who had been unemployed in the past were less compassionate toward the man in the story, and they saw him less favorably than did participants who had never been unemployed or were unemployed at the time.

A second experiment revealed similar trends. Participants read one of three vignettes about a high schooler who was being bullied by peers. The bullies “publicly tease the student in the cafeteria and threw a half-eaten apple at him.” In the first version of the story, the student fails to control his emotions and physically hurts the bullies. In the second version, the student endures the bullying without reacting. While in the third version, the student again fights the bullies, but “the aggression is said to stem from the grief associated with the loss of a sibling.”

The study participants again ranked their compassion toward the student and evaluated him personally. Some participants had experienced bullying in the past, while others had not.

Among participants who saw the version of the story where the student loses control, participants who had been bullied themselves were less compassionate toward the student than participants who had never been bullied. However, among participants who saw the version of the story where the student endures, former victims of bullying were slightly more compassionate toward the student than participants who had never been bullied.

It turns out, the difference is whether the person is able to overcome the challenge. “When evaluating an individual enduring an emotionally distressing event, having endured the event facilitates compassion, likely by facilitating the ease with which the other’s perspective is adopted (‘I’ve been there too’),” the researchers note.

“When evaluating an individual who fails to endure a distressing event, having previously endured the event may reduce compassion because the event seems less difficult to overcome in hindsight. In turn, others’ struggles to adequately endure the event seem unacceptable.”

These findings have political implications, since “[m]any social programs are designed with the input of those who endured distressing events, including rehab programs designed by former addicts, and social welfare programs crafted by individuals who used to live in poverty themselves.” However, these individuals may not actually be the most compassionate toward those who are struggling since they successfully overcame the challenges themselves.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Researchers:
Rachel L. Ruttan and Loran F. Nordgren, Northwestern University
Mary-Hunter McDonnell, Georgetown University

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • frankology
Previous Article
  • Research & Insights

Relatable Characters Make Stories About Vaccines Relevant

  • November 11, 2015
View Post
Next Article
  • Research & Insights

Concern for Your Community May Feed Conspiracy Theories

  • November 18, 2015
View Post
Professional Development
  • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
  • Science Communications Course 
More of our work
  • Communicating the Complexity of Displacement in a Changing Climate
  • Can #MeToo Have Lasting Influence?
  • Photo by Klaus Nielsen:
    How to Use Stories to Bring ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ Together
  • Why each side of the partisan divide thinks the other is living in an alternate reality
Latest from the Center
  • Most Americans Support Freedom of Information. Almost None Have Ever Used It.
  • October 2025 nationwide survey sheds light on Americans’ increasing worry about housing affordability
  • 2025 ‘Real Good Census’ Reveals a Strategically Vital Field with Strong Rewards, Marking Significant Growth
  • composite image of Audrey Goldfarb and text stating "Science isn't personal: why communicating emotion isn't 'soft,' it's strategic"
    Changemakers in Action: Dr. Audrey Goldfarb
How We Help – Case Studies
  • hands with medicine
    Invest in Trust – a vaccine communications guide for CNAs
  • BROKE project screenshot
    Re-examining narratives on poverty and wealth — the BROKE project
  • illustration of hand holding United States flag
    Covering immigration in local news—an exploration by Define American
UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2026

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.