• About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
  • Research & Insights

No Small Talk: How Discussions About Weather Reveal Our Political Affiliations

  • December 30, 2014
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

As rule, Democrats and Republicans don’t agree on a lot, but surely the one thing you’d expect there would be no argument about is the weather.

Don’t bet on it.

According to a study conducted by sociologists Aaron M. McCright (Michigan State University), Riley E. Dunlap (Oklahoma State University) and Chenyang Xiao (American University), a person’s political affiliation affects how he or she perceives changes in weather.

For their study, the researchers compared weather data for 2012 with findings from a national Gallup Poll also taken that year. In 2012, the United States experienced its fourth warmest winter on record. The Gallup Poll asked 1,000 people whether the winter in their state was warmer than average and whether they considered the higher temperatures to be evidence of climate change. The respondents were also asked about their personal beliefs on climate change, their political identification and whether they believed the scientific community had widely accepted the theory of global warming.

Although both Democrats and Republicans lived through the same winter, the opposing parties could not agree whether the winter was unusually warm. Instead, the researchers found “Democrats…more likely than Republicans to perceive local winter temperatures as warmer than usual.”

Views on the science of climate change mattered, too. People who agreed there was a scientific consensus on climate change were more likely to say the winter of 2012 felt warmer than average. “The more respondents perceive scientific agreement on climate change and the more they believe in…human cause, threat, and seriousness of global warming,” the researchers explain, “the more likely they report local winter temperatures to be warmer than usual.”

“Given the politicization of climate science and political polarization on climate change beliefs in the U.S.,” McCright, Dunlap and Xiao note, “it is not surprising that attribution of warmer-than-usual winter temperatures to global warming is filtered through partisan and ideological lenses.”

The study’s findings have important ramifications for communicators working on the climate issue. As Dunlap told The Washington Post’s Chris Mooney in an interview in November, “If you can’t reach the committed conservatives on the fact that a significantly warmer season might be due to anthropogenic global warming…I think it’s going to be really hard to convince them that the current situation is due to anthropogenic climate change.”

Nature, November 2014

Researchers:
Aaron M. McCright, Michigan State University
Riley E. Dunlap, Oklahoma State University
Chenyang Xiao, American University

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • frankology
Previous Article
  • Research & Insights

When Millennials “Like” You, They Expect Something In Return

  • December 11, 2014
View Post
Next Article
  • Research & Insights

What We’re Learning From What Others Are Discovering

  • January 14, 2015
View Post
Professional Development
  • Science Communications Course 
  • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
More of our work
  • Why Intersectional Stories Are Key to Helping the Communities We Serve
  • Things I learned from YouTube stars, ex-extremists, and storytellers about fighting hate
  • To Win Against False Information, We Must Play Offense
  • The Science of Belief: Move Beyond “Us” and “Them” to “We”
Latest from the Center
  • Most Americans Support Freedom of Information. Almost None Have Ever Used It.
  • October 2025 nationwide survey sheds light on Americans’ increasing worry about housing affordability
  • 2025 ‘Real Good Census’ Reveals a Strategically Vital Field with Strong Rewards, Marking Significant Growth
  • composite image of Audrey Goldfarb and text stating "Science isn't personal: why communicating emotion isn't 'soft,' it's strategic"
    Changemakers in Action: Dr. Audrey Goldfarb
How We Help – Case Studies
  • florida beach
    When the Science Stops at the Shoreline: Sharing Research on Florida’s Red Tide
  • BROKE project screenshot
    Re-examining narratives on poverty and wealth — the BROKE project
  • Council on Foundations - Largest study on narratives about philanthropy
    Largest Study on Narratives About Philanthropy with the Council on Foundations
UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2026

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.