• About
    • About
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • What We’ve Shared
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Strategy Consulting
    • Issue Research
    • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks & Resources
  • Training
  • Case Studies
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • What We’ve Shared
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Strategy Consulting
    • Issue Research
    • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks & Resources
  • Training
  • Case Studies
  • Research & Insights

In Science We Trust

  • May 5, 2016
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

For many science geeks, the image of the Republican Party has been tarnished in recent years by its seemingly extreme anti-science views.

However, a new study suggests that Republican views toward science and policy are similar to those of Independents, both are relatively receptive to using science as a starting point for policy. Instead, it’s Democrats who are the outliers, trusting scientific expertise more than others, according to researchers Joshua M. Blank and Daron Shaw. These findings were published in the March 2015 issue of The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

The researchers gathered survey data from over 2,000 Americans. Participants were asked a series of questions regarding their political ideology, education levels and religious beliefs.

They also ranked how much they thought that policymakers should follow the advice of scientists on a variety of issues, such as same-sex adoption, climate change, nuclear power and the use of animal testing for medical studies.

Importantly, a variety of issues were chosen to ensure push-back from both Democrats and Republicans, such as climate change for conservatives and bioengineered food and crops for liberals.

Conservative and Independent participants were less likely to act on science on “issues that touch on matters of religious faith (gay adoption, evolution) or political ideology (mandatory health insurance).”

However, people across the political spectrum believed policymakers should take into account the science on most issues, at the very least “weighing it equally with other factors.”

Democrats in the study consistently deferred to the science across every issue. “It is the relative prescience attitudes of Democrats that stand in contrast to the rest of the population, not the anti-science attitudes of Republicans,” explain the researchers.

This was true even on issues where Democrats were expected to be skeptical of the scientific consensus, like nuclear power.

“What science has to say about an issue appears to be a reasonable starting point for lawmakers or bureaucrats seeking to forge consensus on a given issue,” the researchers explain. Although the public likely won’t agree on every issue – particularly highly politicized ones and ones touching on faith.

Lastly, because liberals put so much faith in science, “if you want to get Democrats on your side, you may want to use scientific research to back up your policy positions.”

The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 

Researchers:
Joshua M. Blank, The Texas Politics Project
Daron Shaw, University of Texas at Austin

0
0
0
Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • Democrats
  • frankology
  • information avoidance
  • politics
  • Republicans
  • science
Previous Article
  • Research & Insights

Volunteers Stay When They See the Difference They Make

  • April 28, 2016
View Post
Next Article
  • Research & Insights

Make it Personal to Increase Support for Your Cause

  • May 10, 2016
View Post
Think we can help with your goals? Read about our services and how we work.
Or reach out today to tell us a bit about your project and inquire how we might help.

 
 

Join our network

We'll send insights and opportunities when you least expect

More of our work
  • The Science of Story Building
  • The Science of Story Building Webinar
  • Photo by Klaus Nielsen:
    How to Use Stories to Bring ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ Together
  • Photo by Jean Balzan, pexels
    Building a Communication Strategy for Diversity and Inclusion
Latest from the Center
  • Teresa Gonzales and Nicole Bronzan
    Paper exploring local discursive frames of poverty and race wins 2023 research prize
  • Center welcomes two collaborators in research and strategy
  • 2023 Research Prize Finalists
    Center announces three finalists for the $10,000 public interest communications research prize
  • Rakeem Robinson
    Center honors the memory of colleague Rakeem Robinson
How We Help – Case Studies
  • BROKE project screenshot
    Re-examining narratives on poverty and wealth — the BROKE project
  • illustration
    Innovation Service of UNHCR: the UN Refugee Agency
  • Strategic Communications Academy for University of Florida Engineering Scholars

Subscribe

Keep up with our latest; request our periodic newsletter.

UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2022

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for social change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Social Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.