• About
    • About
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • What We’ve Shared
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Strategy Consulting
    • Issue Research
    • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks & Resources
  • Training
  • Case Studies
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • What We’ve Shared
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Strategy Consulting
    • Issue Research
    • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks & Resources
  • Training
  • Case Studies
  • Research & Insights

Researchers Say Remembering Conflict Can Reduce Partisanship

  • August 17, 2015
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

With the 2016 election cycle ramping up, it seems like Americans are more politically polarized than ever. But a new study suggests that when reminded of a time when they experienced conflict, people are more open to hearing opposing views.

Writing in the July 2015 issue of Social Psychological and Personality Science,Psychologists Chadly Stern from New York University and Tali Keilman from The Hebrew University of Jerusalem found that getting people to remember conflicting goals in their own personal lives reduced their tendency to overstate political differences between themselves and their partisan rivals.

In the study 800 survey participants were first asked their political affiliation – whether they identified as Democrats or Republicans. They were then asked whether they supported or opposed eight political stances. For instance, participants were asked whether they would support the legalization of marijuana use, or the banning of assault weapons.

Next, one group of participants was asked to write “about a time when two of the goals that they wanted to achieve and were important to them conflicted.” A control group was asked to write about what they did that morning.

Afterward participants were asked how they thought people in the other political party felt about the eight issues.

Stern and Keilman found that “a conflict mindset reduced participants’ tendency to consistently exaggerate” how different the attitudes of people in the opposing party are from their own attitudes on the issues. This held true when controlling for the amount of time people had to think about the issues.

In other words, when people contemplate conflict they have experienced in their own lives, perceived polarization between themselves and the other political group diminishes.

Social Psychological and Personality Science

Researchers:
Chadly Stern, New York University
Tali Kleiman, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

0
0
0
Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • frankology
Previous Article
  • Research & Insights

6 Ways To Use Emotion In Your Campaigns, According To Research

  • August 13, 2015
View Post
Next Article
  • Research & Insights

Frighteningly Effective: Scare Parents to Increase Vaccination Intentions

  • August 26, 2015
View Post
Think we can help with your goals? Read about our services and how we work.
Or reach out today to tell us a bit about your project and inquire how we might help.

 
 

Join our network

We'll send insights and opportunities when you least expect

More of our work
  • The Secret to Better Storytelling for Social Change: Better Partnerships
  • Communicating the Complexity of Displacement in a Changing Climate
  • The Science of Belief: Identify Perceptions of Harm
  • Stop Raising Awareness Already
Latest from the Center
  • Teresa Gonzales and Nicole Bronzan
    Paper exploring local discursive frames of poverty and race wins 2023 research prize
  • Center welcomes two collaborators in research and strategy
  • 2023 Research Prize Finalists
    Center announces three finalists for the $10,000 public interest communications research prize
  • Rakeem Robinson
    Center honors the memory of colleague Rakeem Robinson
How We Help – Case Studies
  • illustration of hand holding United States flag
    Covering immigration in local news—an exploration by Define American
  • BROKE project screenshot
    Re-examining narratives on poverty and wealth — the BROKE project
  • gloved hand holding vial
    Science-based communication strategy on COVID for the UN Verified Initiative

Subscribe

Keep up with our latest; request our periodic newsletter.

UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2022

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for social change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Social Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.