• About
    • About
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • What We’ve Shared
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Strategy Consulting
    • Issue Research
    • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks & Resources
  • Training
  • Case Studies
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • What We’ve Shared
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Strategy Consulting
    • Issue Research
    • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks & Resources
  • Training
  • Case Studies
  • Research & Insights

Google this: You’re not as smart as you think you are

  • May 6, 2015
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

New research out of Yale University’s Department of Psychology suggests that having a smartphone with the world’s information at your fingertips may be doing more than distracting you from your dinnertime conversation. It may be tricking you into thinking you’re more knowledgeable than you actually are.

To learn more about how internet searching changes how we evaluate our own knowledge, psychology researchers Matthew Fisher, Mariel K. Goddu, and Frank C. Keil did a series of nine experiments each including at least 302 participants. Respondents first answered a series of common trivia questions, for instance, “Why are there leap years?” Some participants were instructed to use the internet to search for answers, while others were not allowed to look up the questions online. Respondents were then asked how knowledgeable they thought they were about a second list of trivia questions, such as “Why can’t HIV be transmitted through saliva?”

Fisher, Goddu, and Keil found that searching for the trivia information online led people to believe they were more knowledgeable even about the topics they hadn’t searched for. Participants who used the search engine consistently ranked themselves as higher in knowledge about the topics they hadn’t searched for than the participants who didn’t use the internet.

Interestingly, this effect held true even when the respondents couldn’t find a complete answer to trivia questions. One of the studies replaced the easily-Googled first set of questions with a series of complex and specialized questions, such as “How does the location of Cameroon affect the health of its inhabitants?” These questions were designed to foil the participants’ searching skills, leaving them with only incomplete answers. The researchers were surprised to find that even after respondents’ searches returned “zero results,” respondents who searched for information online still reported having higher levels of knowledge than participants who didn’t do a search.

Fisher, Goddu, and Keil believe this happens because “searching the Internet leads people to conflate information that can be found online with knowledge ‘in the head.’” That is, people mistake information they found online with information they already knew, leading them to over-estimate how much knowledge they have stored in their brains.

“After using Google to retrieve answers to questions,” the authors note, “people seem to believe they came up with these answers on their own.”

This is especially important when working on communications efforts aimed at policymakers. As Fisher points out in an interview with the American Psychological Association, “In cases where decisions have big consequences, it could be important for people to distinguish their own knowledge and not assume they know something when they actually don’t.”

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Researchers:
Matthew Fisher, Mariel K. Goddu, Frank C. Keil, Yale University
0
0
0
Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • frankology
Previous Article
  • Research & Insights

Some Chilling Findings About Global Warming Surveys

  • April 28, 2015
View Post
Next Article
  • Research & Insights

Where does your compass point? Toward science or religion?

  • May 8, 2015
View Post
Think we can help with your goals? Read about our services and how we work.
Or reach out today to tell us a bit about your project and inquire how we might help.

 
 

Join our network

We'll send insights and opportunities when you least expect

More of our work
  • Why Intersectional Stories Are Key to Helping the Communities We Serve
  • BROKE project screenshot
    Re-examining narratives on poverty and wealth — the BROKE project
  • The Secret to Better Storytelling for Social Change: Better Partnerships
  • Stop Raising Awareness Already
Latest from the Center
  • Teresa Gonzales and Nicole Bronzan
    Paper exploring local discursive frames of poverty and race wins 2023 research prize
  • Center welcomes two collaborators in research and strategy
  • 2023 Research Prize Finalists
    Center announces three finalists for the $10,000 public interest communications research prize
  • Rakeem Robinson
    Center honors the memory of colleague Rakeem Robinson
How We Help – Case Studies
  • illustration of hand holding United States flag
    Covering immigration in local news—an exploration by Define American
  • hands with medicine
    Invest in Trust – a vaccine communications guide for CNAs
  • Strategic Communications Academy for University of Florida Engineering Scholars

Subscribe

Keep up with our latest; request our periodic newsletter.

UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2022

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for social change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Social Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.