• About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
  • Research & Insights

Diversity in Media Makes Us More Tolerant

  • October 14, 2015
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

Some good news for those of us who spent last weekend on the couch with Netflix: new research suggests that watching television shows with women and racial minorities makes us more tolerant of both.

The study was conducted by political scientist Jeremiah J. Garretson of Stony Brook University and appears in a 2015 issue of the journal Politics, Groups, and Identities. In it, Garretson examines the impact of increased representation of racial minorities and women in television on our attitudes towards race and gender. He found that “television viewers have similar or higher levels of social tolerance compared with non-viewers when recurring portrayals [of women and racial minorities] become more frequent.”

Garretson compiled information from several major studies examining the representation of women, racial minorities, and LGBT people in television programs from 1970 through 2000. The studies revealed that representation of these groups generally went up during this time period.

He then compiled data from the General Social Survey (GSS) on racial attitudes, attitudes towards LGBT people, and attitudes towards women for the same time period of 1970 to 2000. Along with the responses to these questions, Garretson included in his models information about “birth cohort, education, religion, region, race, sex, ideology, and party identification” – all major factors which impact social tolerance.           Included in his model was the number of self-reported hours of television consumption for each person.

Garretson found that when representation of racial minorities, women in the workforce, and LGBT people on television was low, increased consumption of television made people less socially tolerant. However, when representation of these groups is higher, increased time in front of the television was correlated with more tolerant attitudes.

“When regular gay, lesbian, and bisexual characters are absent from television, six hours of reported television consumption results in a drop in the probability of believing that same-sex relations are not wrong by about 14%,” Garretson reports. “However, when gay, lesbian, and bisexual representation is high, not only do these negative effects disappear, but increased television consumption becomes associate with more positive effects.”

The study suggests that television “[e]fforts by those concerned with the rights of minority groups to monitor and influence the entertainment industry do not appear to be in vain.”

Indeed, Garretson notes that “[b]y isolating an independent effect of fictional portrayals, this study also suggests that those in positions of control within the entertainment industry can increase public tolerance if they exert the effort to change the images they put before us.”

Politics, Groups, and Identities

Researchers:
Jeremiah J. Garretson, Stony Brook University

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • frankology
Previous Article
  • Research & Insights

How to Destigmatize Mental Illness

  • October 12, 2015
View Post
Next Article
  • Research & Insights

Your Audience’s Personal Values Are More Important Than Yours

  • October 19, 2015
View Post
Professional Development
  • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • Science Communications Course 
  • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
More of our work
  • Changing Mindsets, Changing the Rules
  • The Science of Belief: Move Beyond “Us” and “Them” to “We”
  • Can #MeToo Have Lasting Influence?
  • Why each side of the partisan divide thinks the other is living in an alternate reality
Latest from the Center
  • Most Americans Support Freedom of Information. Almost None Have Ever Used It.
  • October 2025 nationwide survey sheds light on Americans’ increasing worry about housing affordability
  • 2025 ‘Real Good Census’ Reveals a Strategically Vital Field with Strong Rewards, Marking Significant Growth
  • composite image of Audrey Goldfarb and text stating "Science isn't personal: why communicating emotion isn't 'soft,' it's strategic"
    Changemakers in Action: Dr. Audrey Goldfarb
How We Help – Case Studies
  • florida beach
    When the Science Stops at the Shoreline: Sharing Research on Florida’s Red Tide
  • Staff professional development via ‘drip’ training integrated in Slack
  • hands with medicine
    Invest in Trust – a vaccine communications guide for CNAs
UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2026

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.