• About
    • About
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • What We’ve Shared
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Strategy Consulting
    • Issue Research
    • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks & Resources
  • Training
  • Case Studies
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • What We’ve Shared
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Strategy Consulting
    • Issue Research
    • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks & Resources
  • Training
  • Case Studies
  • Research & Insights

Bad Vibes: Negative Images Reduce Charitable Giving

  • November 25, 2015
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

A new study suggests that appeals for humanitarian aid are less likely to succeed if people see images or are told things they find too upsetting.

This comes from a series of studies that found when fundraising appeals feature images of people who can be helped alongside those who can’t, the willingness to be charitable decreases.

The studies, conducted by researchers Daniel Västfjäll, Paul Slovic and Marcus Mayorga from Decision Research, and published in a 2015 issue of the journal Frontiers in Psychology, show that negative information – like photos of people that can’t be helped or disturbing images – can make people feel less effective at helping others.

These results come from a series of studies in which a request for charity aid was accompanied by photographs of children. The photographs contained captions indicating that some of the children could be helped by the charity and others could not. After viewing the request for aid and the photos, the participants were asked to consider giving money to a charity to help the children and to rank how warm they would feel about their donation.

Some participants saw six children they could help and one they could not. Some saw two children they could help and one they could not. While others saw one child they could help and one they could not, and a fourth group saw a single child who could be helped.

Participants then rated how warm they would feel about making a charitable donation to help the children. Studies have found people help others partially for altruistic reasons, but also because it provides a warm, positive feeling for the helper. In this case, however, the researchers found that participants felt less warm when thinking about a donation when the photo of the child they could help was paired with photos of children they couldn’t help. This effect appeared “even when a substantial proportion of children, though not all, can be helped.”

The researchers suggest that the reason for this is because other, nearby information and images can impact our emotional response to a plea for charity. Another study, for instance, found that showing participants both a photo of a child that can be helped by charitable giving alongside photos of unrelated negative images (such as a shark and a gun) also decreased how warm participants anticipated feeling after giving a donation.

“Irrelevant negative feelings associated with those not able to be helped appeared to blend with the good feelings for those who can be helped, leading to dampened warm glow,” the researchers explain.

This means that requests for donations or calls to action, which include upsetting images or descriptions of massive need, may reduce how positive their audiences feel about stepping up. “One charity put the statistic, ‘3 million in need’ above the picture of a starving child, likely demotivating many donors,” the researchers note.

Frontiers in Psychology 

Researchers:
Daniel Västfjäll, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden and Decision Research
Paul Slovic and Marcus Mayorga, Decision Research and University of Oregon

0
0
0
Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • frankology
Previous Article
  • Research & Insights

Reducing the Stigma of Eating Disorders with the Right Message

  • November 23, 2015
View Post
Next Article
  • Research & Insights

4 studies on increasing empathy and donations this holiday season

  • November 27, 2015
View Post
Think we can help with your goals? Read about our services and how we work.
Or reach out today to tell us a bit about your project and inquire how we might help.

 
 

Join our network

We'll send insights and opportunities when you least expect

More of our work
  • Why Intersectional Stories Are Key to Helping the Communities We Serve
  • Can #MeToo Have Lasting Influence?
  • Changing Mindsets, Changing the Rules
  • Building the Field of Public Interest Communications
Latest from the Center
  • Teresa Gonzales and Nicole Bronzan
    Paper exploring local discursive frames of poverty and race wins 2023 research prize
  • Center welcomes two collaborators in research and strategy
  • 2023 Research Prize Finalists
    Center announces three finalists for the $10,000 public interest communications research prize
  • Rakeem Robinson
    Center honors the memory of colleague Rakeem Robinson
How We Help – Case Studies
  • BROKE project screenshot
    Re-examining narratives on poverty and wealth — the BROKE project
  • gloved hand holding vial
    Science-based communication strategy on COVID for the UN Verified Initiative
  • Strategic Communications Academy for University of Florida Engineering Scholars

Subscribe

Keep up with our latest; request our periodic newsletter.

UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2022

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for social change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Social Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.