• About
    • About
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • What We’ve Shared
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Strategy Consulting
    • Issue Research
    • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks & Resources
  • Training
  • Case Studies
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • What We’ve Shared
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Strategy Consulting
    • Issue Research
    • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks & Resources
  • Training
  • Case Studies
  • Research & Insights

Naming and Shaming Corporate Offenders Causes Pain, Then Change

  • August 11, 2014
  • 1 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

Some would like us to believe that corporations are people. But if so, one thing they don’t share with real people is the protection offered by the childhood nursery rhyme that says, “sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt.”

Turns out that activist campaigns that “name and shame” companies take their toll as consumers who learn of their offending behaviors curtail purchases.

In the December 2011 issue of Social Forces, sociologists Tim Bartley and Curtis Child of Indiana University write that “activist campaigns filter into the preferences of consumers, who are the key force in punishing or rewarding firms.”

Bartley and Child focused on the anti-sweatshop campaigns that targeted well known firms like Nike and Walmart as well as lesser-known firms that sell to businesses, rather than consumers.

Among their findings:

  • Anti-sweatshop campaigns have negatively impacted firms, including Nike, Walmart and the Gap. The three firms, which have famous and recognizable products, experienced greater drops in sales than unknown textile firms that generally sell to other businesses.
  • “Name and shame” campaigns can also contribute to a drop in stock prices of the targeted companies.
  • Targeted firms pay attention and will respond instituting policies that lead to more responsible social behavior.

Social Forces, December 2011

Researchers:
Tim Bartley, Indiana University-Bloomington
Curtis Child, Brigham Young University

0
0
0
Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • frankology
Previous Article
  • Research & Insights

Want People To Listen? Talk to Them The Way You’d Want Someone To Talk To You

  • August 11, 2014
View Post
Next Article
  • Research & Insights

Meet the New Spokespeople For Climate Change: Politicians

  • August 11, 2014
View Post
Think we can help with your goals? Read about our services and how we work.
Or reach out today to tell us a bit about your project and inquire how we might help.

 
 

Join our network

We'll send insights and opportunities when you least expect

More of our work
  • The Science of Belief: Use Values and Worldviews to Build Bridges
  • How to Tell Stories About Complex Issues
  • How We Are Making Sure The Science We Share Is Good
  • The Science of Story Building
Latest from the Center
  • Teresa Gonzales and Nicole Bronzan
    Paper exploring local discursive frames of poverty and race wins 2023 research prize
  • Center welcomes two collaborators in research and strategy
  • 2023 Research Prize Finalists
    Center announces three finalists for the $10,000 public interest communications research prize
  • Rakeem Robinson
    Center honors the memory of colleague Rakeem Robinson
How We Help – Case Studies
  • illustration
    Innovation Service of UNHCR: the UN Refugee Agency
  • BROKE project screenshot
    Re-examining narratives on poverty and wealth — the BROKE project
  • hands with medicine
    Invest in Trust – a vaccine communications guide for CNAs

Subscribe

Keep up with our latest; request our periodic newsletter.

UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2022

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for social change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Social Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.