• About
    • About
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • What We’ve Shared
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Strategy Consulting
    • Issue Research
    • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks & Resources
  • Training
  • Case Studies
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • What We’ve Shared
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Strategy Consulting
    • Issue Research
    • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks & Resources
  • Training
  • Case Studies
  • Research & Insights

How We Talk About Climate Change Solutions Matters

  • September 14, 2015
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

Climate communicators are working overtime to translate the findings of climate researchers into information that the public can comprehend and respond to with action. New research offers some guidance about how to do so effectively.

Study findings published in a forthcoming issue of the journal Climate Risk Management examine how people respond to two distinct climate-change terms: resilience and adaptation. The study, conducted by researchers Gabrielle Wong-Parodi from Carnegie Mellon University and her colleagues, involved 450 participants.

“Resilience” refers to a trait which “reflect[s] a general ability to master challenges.” It usually implies growing new capacities to deal with a challenge. “Adaptation,” on the other hand, is “a state, reflecting how individuals deal with specific” situations, and typically involves preserving the resources one already has.

Although these two terms are distinct and unique for climate change researchers, Wong-Parodi wanted to see how well they translated for the public. That is, when it comes to mobilizing the public to deal with climate change, is one term better than the other?

In an experiment, they asked participants to imagine moving to a fictional coastal town, Seaside. Participants were asked to research coastal flooding and then respond to the question, “How do you think that your family might use information about coastal flooding?”

Some participants (the control group) answered the written prompt immediately, while others were taken to Seaside’s fictional website, where they read about Seaside’s policy of either adapting to or being resilient in the face of coastal flooding.

For example, the welcome page of the adaptation group read, “Seaside and its citizens are investing increasing their ability to adapt in the face of coastal flooding risks. One of our programs helps Seaside adapt by helping families make emergency plans…Your family can feel good about Adapt Seaside.”

The welcome page of the resilience group read, “Seaside and its citizens are investing increasing their resilience in the face of coastal flooding risks. One of our programs helps Seaside become more resilient by helping families make emergency plans…Your family can feel good about Resilient Seaside.”

The participants then explored the risk of coastal flooding on the Seaside page before answering a survey about their concern about flooding and their motivation to prepare for floods.

The researchers found that people who read about resilience were less likely to prepare for floods and saw the proposed actions as less helpful in dealing with flooding.

“Adaptation appears to make flooding risks seem more manageable and individual preparatory action as more worthwhile,” the researchers explain, “while Resilience appears to raise concerns, to the point of making individual actions appear less useful.”

“’Resilience’ appears to evoke a more cautious attitude regarding the effectiveness of individual actions, whereas a policy of ‘Adaptation’ may suggest that the risks are manageable,” they note. “Adaptation appears better for motivating individual action.”

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Researchers:
Gabrielle Wong-Parodi and Baruch Fischoff, Carnegie Mellon University
Benjamin Strauss, Climate Central

0
0
0
Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • frankology
Previous Article
  • Research & Insights

What Bridges The Partisan Divide? Harm, According To Research

  • September 9, 2015
View Post
Next Article
  • Research & Insights

How Diversity Makes Us More Empathetic

  • September 16, 2015
View Post
Think we can help with your goals? Read about our services and how we work.
Or reach out today to tell us a bit about your project and inquire how we might help.

 
 

Join our network

We'll send insights and opportunities when you least expect

More of our work
  • The Science of Belief: Use Values and Worldviews to Build Bridges
  • Building the Field of Public Interest Communications
  • Illustration by Ailadi.
    Designing Diverse and Gender Inclusive Humanitarian Organizations
  • Persuasion in a “Post-Truth” World
Latest from the Center
  • Teresa Gonzales and Nicole Bronzan
    Paper exploring local discursive frames of poverty and race wins 2023 research prize
  • Center welcomes two collaborators in research and strategy
  • 2023 Research Prize Finalists
    Center announces three finalists for the $10,000 public interest communications research prize
  • Rakeem Robinson
    Center honors the memory of colleague Rakeem Robinson
How We Help – Case Studies
  • BROKE project screenshot
    Re-examining narratives on poverty and wealth — the BROKE project
  • gloved hand holding vial
    Science-based communication strategy on COVID for the UN Verified Initiative
  • illustration
    Innovation Service of UNHCR: the UN Refugee Agency

Subscribe

Keep up with our latest; request our periodic newsletter.

UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2022

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for social change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Social Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.