• About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
  • Research & Insights

A Winning Combination for Anti-Smoking Cigarette Labels

  • December 21, 2015
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

New research suggests that cigarette labels emphasizing the benefits of quitting (rather than the consequences of continuing to smoke) are more likely to motivate young people to kick the habit.

The study, conducted by researcher Darren Mays of the Georgetown University Medical Center and his colleagues, involved more than 700 young smokers who were exposed to a series of cigarette warning labels. The researchers found that by promoting the benefits of quitting, young smokers were more likely to take notice. Their results were published in a 2015 issue of the journal Tobacco Control.

For the study, participants were asked to view one of four series of anti-smoking cigarette package labels. Each series contained packages which combined a graphic medical image with a written description of the medical risks associated with smoking. Two of the series framed these warnings in terms of the loss of health, as recommended by the CDC (“Cigarettes cause cancer”). The other two series flipped these messages to convey the health benefits that come when a person stops smoking (“Quitting smoking reduces the risk of cancer”).

Additionally, two series of labels (one framed with loss of health and one framed with health gains) were placed against a basic brown background with the cigarette brand name written in plain text. The other two series were placed against the background of an unfamiliar cigarette brand, complete with logo.

Participants viewed the warning labels and then answered a series of questions regarding their motivation to quit smoking.

When the warning labels were placed on packages that still contained the cigarette’s brand, both the loss of health warnings and the benefits of quitting labels performed equally well. However, when the labels were placed against the basic brown package, the messages about improving health outcomes were more effective at raising the motivation levels of young smokers to quit.

“Our findings suggest a synergistic effect between health warnings with gain-framed messaging and plain packaging, creating the potential for enhanced public health impact when these regulations are implemented together,” the researchers write.

Tobacco Control

Researchers:
Darren Mays, George Luta, and Kenneth P. Tercyak, Georgetown University Medical Center
Raymond S. Niaura, Georgetown University Medical Center, Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
W. Douglas Evans, George Washington University

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • frankology
Previous Article
  • Research & Insights

Reputation Matters In Partnerships Between Businesses and Nonprofits

  • December 16, 2015
View Post
Next Article
  • Research & Insights

Thinking About Morality Encourages Charitable Actions

  • December 23, 2015
View Post
Professional Development
  • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
  • Science Communications Course 
More of our work
  • Philanthropy's New Voice: Building Trust with Deeper Stories and Clear Language
    Philanthropy’s Messaging Creates Confusion. Telling Better Stories Can Build Trust
  • BROKE project screenshot
    Re-examining narratives on poverty and wealth — the BROKE project
  • Why Intersectional Stories Are Key to Helping the Communities We Serve
  • Most Americans believe we should have gun regulation. Here is why those who don’t are winning the debate.
Latest from the Center
  • Most Americans Support Freedom of Information. Almost None Have Ever Used It.
  • October 2025 nationwide survey sheds light on Americans’ increasing worry about housing affordability
  • 2025 ‘Real Good Census’ Reveals a Strategically Vital Field with Strong Rewards, Marking Significant Growth
  • composite image of Audrey Goldfarb and text stating "Science isn't personal: why communicating emotion isn't 'soft,' it's strategic"
    Changemakers in Action: Dr. Audrey Goldfarb
How We Help – Case Studies
  • hands with medicine
    Invest in Trust – a vaccine communications guide for CNAs
  • UpTogether - Case Study - The Center for Public Interest Communications
    Using Research to Change Narratives About Direct Cash Assistance for UpTogether
  • Staff professional development via ‘drip’ training integrated in Slack
UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2026

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.