• About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
  • Case Study

Using Research to Change Narratives About Direct Cash Assistance for UpTogether

  • January 17, 2025
  • 3 minute read
UpTogether - Case Study - The Center for Public Interest Communications
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

The Challenge

During the pandemic, many Americans had a chance to experience what it felt like to have a little bit of help when times were tough. Pandemic income assistance through COVID-19 relief checks and the Child Tax Credit provided help to many who were facing income insecurity and helped our communities survive the conditions of poverty accelerated by the pandemic. Americans were receiving cash that allowed them to make financial choices more confidently in a time of great uncertainty. And people liked these policies.

But sustained support for guaranteed income faces a major hurdle: long-standing deep narratives about poverty, including bootstrap individualism, resistance to handouts, and deservingness. 

While the purpose of the project was to understand Massachusetts, the long-term focus of the project was to provide UpTogether and its coalitions with research and tools they could adapt to their strategies in other states.

uptogether case study

In 2023, UpTogether – a national nonprofit dedicated to community-based solutions to poverty – requested proposals for a narrative change strategy that could help their team challenge the existing narratives about poverty in Massachusetts. Their goal: to build support for direct cash programs across the state. They wanted to know what stories they should tell and what language they should use to resonate with various actors across the state.

The Center proposed a year-long project to understand the worldviews and values of Massachusettsans, test messages and metaphors that resonated with them, and help UpTogether develop a toolkit of narrative themes that UpTogether and their collaborators could employ to accomplish their goal. While the purpose of the project was to understand Massachusetts, the long-term focus of the project was to provide UpTogether and its coalitions with research and tools they could adapt to their strategies in other states.

Using Research to Change Narratives About Direct Cash Assistance - UpTogether and The Center
Let’s strategize

Research in Action 

This project had two major components: research and training. Our project began with a literature review and landscape scan to understand the current conversations around guaranteed income and direct cash. We used this research and client meetings to develop a mixed-method research plan that included interviews and three different surveys. 

The Center’s process is always interactive — we design our projects to bring practitioners into the world of research. Throughout the project, the UpTogether team was invited to develop questions, provide insight, and recommend interviewees in a way that was compliant with IRB standards. Additionally, we developed tailored workshops that introduced UpTogether and the Trust + Invest Collaborative to our frameworks as well as provided space for collaborative strategy development. Through this, we identified which of the Six Spheres of Influence UpTogether should prioritize and how they could bring this research to their Massachusetts-based collaborators.

The research led us to three major findings: 

  1. Messages that lean into in-group loyalty resonated well with Massachussettsans of all political backgrounds. 
  2. People respond better to abundance metaphors regardless of political affiliation — framing basic income as a “strong foundation” or a place to “nurture community” rather than a tool in the “war on poverty.”
  3. The terms we use on this topic need to be concrete – people are more comfortable with terms that are less abstract like “direct cash,” but are open to terms like “guaranteed basic income” if we define them clearly. 

We used this research to develop a collection of seven narratives, frames, and stories that UpTogether could use to build messages that can move Massachussettsans to take action. We provided immediate tailoring support for members of the UpTogether team so that they could bring these research-backed messages to coalition meetings and policy hearings.

Measurable Change 

This project wrapped in Summer 2024, and we are paying close attention to the long-term effects of these messages. Programs like the ones UpTogether supports have shown up in political conversations throughout this year’s elections, and we are tracking how the narrative has shifted or stayed the same from the early phase of our research. 

In the short term, UpTogether is reporting some success locally in Massachusetts in conversations with funders and various leaders across the Commonwealth.


The Center - Partnership Form

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • Narrative Change
  • Research Translation & Insights
  • UpTogether
Previous Article
Council on Foundations - Largest study on narratives about philanthropy
  • Case Study

Largest Study on Narratives About Philanthropy with the Council on Foundations

  • December 21, 2024
View Post
Next Article
  • Case Study

Staff professional development via ‘drip’ training integrated in Slack

  • October 10, 2025
View Post
Professional Development
  • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
  • Science Communications Course 
  • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
More of our work
  • Communicating the Complexity of Displacement in a Changing Climate
  • Changing Mindsets, Changing the Rules
  • BROKE project screenshot
    Re-examining narratives on poverty and wealth — the BROKE project
  • Most Americans believe we should have gun regulation. Here is why those who don’t are winning the debate.
Latest from the Center
  • Most Americans Support Freedom of Information. Almost None Have Ever Used It.
  • October 2025 nationwide survey sheds light on Americans’ increasing worry about housing affordability
  • 2025 ‘Real Good Census’ Reveals a Strategically Vital Field with Strong Rewards, Marking Significant Growth
  • composite image of Audrey Goldfarb and text stating "Science isn't personal: why communicating emotion isn't 'soft,' it's strategic"
    Changemakers in Action: Dr. Audrey Goldfarb
How We Help – Case Studies
  • illustration of hand holding United States flag
    Covering immigration in local news—an exploration by Define American
  • florida beach
    When the Science Stops at the Shoreline: Sharing Research on Florida’s Red Tide
  • Council on Foundations - Largest study on narratives about philanthropy
    Largest Study on Narratives About Philanthropy with the Council on Foundations
UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2026

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.