• About
    • About
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • What We’ve Shared
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Strategy Consulting
    • Issue Research
    • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks & Resources
  • Training
  • Case Studies
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • What We’ve Shared
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Contact Us
  • Our Services
    • Strategy Consulting
    • Issue Research
    • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks & Resources
  • Training
  • Case Studies
  • Research & Insights

We Like All Things Local, Even Messages About Climate Change

  • November 4, 2014
  • 3 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

By Zoe Green

Researchers:
Leila Scannell
Robert Gifford
University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia

Climate change poses a global threat to everyone, so why aren’t people more receptive to calls to action?

University of Victoria researchers Leila Scannell and Robert Gifford attempted to answer that question for a paper published in the January 2013 issue of Environment and Behavior. Scannell and Gifford found that when calls to action emphasize threats to local communities or target women, there’s a greater likelihood people will respond.

For their study, Scannell and Gifford examined the reactions of 324 people living in the Kootenay, Okanagan, and the Vancouver Island regions of British Columbia, who were shown informational posters about the dangers of climate change.

Here’s what they found:

Place matters.

People with a strong sense of place attachment – a sense of connectedness to a local area – are more likely to take action to combat the threat of climate change in their area.

The study’s findings suggest residents who “have stronger place attachment” are “more engaged with climate change issues.” According to the researchers, place attachment is a good indicator of climate change engagement because people are often “more willing to exert effort to protect their meaningful places.”

Local Messages are more compelling than global ones.

Local messages work even for those with transient lifestyles. When the impact is framed on a local level and shows the negative effects of climate change, people, wherever they live, are more likely to respond to climate change warnings, Scannell and Gifford concluded.

When study participants were presented with messages focused on threats from climate change “in terms of their broad effects expected to occur on a global scale,” such as the melting ice sheets in polar regions and rising global sea levels, the messages had little effect on the participants’ engagement with climate change. In fact, participants who were shown global messages were no more likely to take action than participants who were not shown any message at all about climate change.

In contrast, messages that emphasized the impact of climate change on a local level – the likelihood of forest fires in the Okanagan region or pine beetle infestations in the Kootenay region, for example – led to greater climate change engagement among participants.

Women are more likely to respond than men.

Scannell and Gifford also found that women were more likely than men to pay attention to warnings about climate change, even though both sexes were shown the same messages.

Although this suggests that women are better targets for climate-change communicators because “women often report more environmental concern than men,” the article also cites other research that shows women take less practical action against climate change, “particularly when they lack access to financial capital, cannot implement low-carbon options, or are excluded from climate change-relevant decision making.”

Considering the barriers that women may face, the study concludes that more research should look at “how to empower and educate women of lower socioeconomic statuses in climate change issues.”

Overall, the level of place attachment, locality of the message, and gender of the audience can play a large role in the effectiveness of communication about climate change. In addition to reaching out to people who feel connected to their area and women who are more likely to care about environmental issues, messages that expose the local threats of climate change have a greater chance of inspiring audiences to take action.

Environment and Behavior, January 2013

Zoe Green is a third year English major at the University of Florida, minoring in Mass Communications and Education

0
0
0
Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • frankology
Previous Article
  • Research & Insights

The Pyramid Approach: How Twitter Use Is Shaping Up Among Advocacy Groups

  • October 30, 2014
View Post
Next Article
  • Research & Insights

Why It’s In Your Best Interest Not To Touch The Mute Button

  • November 7, 2014
View Post
Think we can help with your goals? Read about our services and how we work.
Or reach out today to tell us a bit about your project and inquire how we might help.

 
 

Join our network

We'll send insights and opportunities when you least expect

2 comments
  1. Patricia W. Green says:
    November 11, 2014 at 2:33 pm

    Zoe, I agree that women are more aware of….. everything!
    Climate change is a devestating phenomenon that is changing our world but because we can’t bomb something or somebody, it doesn’t get much attention. I believe it is too late to correct the problems facing the earth because the polar ice cap is melting (due to the greenhouse effect) and much of the coolness of the earth is dependent on the ice cap. When the ice cap is gone (which is rapidly happening now) the sun’s heat and radiation will be unbearable. So much can be done now to save us from total devastation if the politicians believed there was a problem and acted. The politicians in Florida are not going to help.

  2. David says:
    November 14, 2014 at 9:11 am

    Naomi Klein in “This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. The Climate” states that action against climate change crosses fundamental conceptions about the economy and work that stall the conversation. Kill jobs for the planet? Regulate industries into unprofitability? Our more pressing security always trumps the truths of long-term security. The local is still the theater for engagement, but the battle first must take on a rotten capitalist headlock on the world’s welfare. We start by making for-profit local utilities public-owned (energy decisions should not be made by those who make money on results) and then take back the state legislature, boot the frackers and drillers and rebuild a climate-friendly infrastructure.

Comments are closed.

More of our work
  • Changing Mindsets, Changing the Rules
  • How to Tell Stories About Complex Issues
  • Why Intersectional Stories Are Key to Helping the Communities We Serve
  • Can #MeToo Have Lasting Influence?
Latest from the Center
  • Teresa Gonzales and Nicole Bronzan
    Paper exploring local discursive frames of poverty and race wins 2023 research prize
  • Center welcomes two collaborators in research and strategy
  • 2023 Research Prize Finalists
    Center announces three finalists for the $10,000 public interest communications research prize
  • Rakeem Robinson
    Center honors the memory of colleague Rakeem Robinson
How We Help – Case Studies
  • BROKE project screenshot
    Re-examining narratives on poverty and wealth — the BROKE project
  • hands with medicine
    Invest in Trust – a vaccine communications guide for CNAs
  • illustration
    Innovation Service of UNHCR: the UN Refugee Agency

Subscribe

Keep up with our latest; request our periodic newsletter.

UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2022

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for social change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Social Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.