• About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
  • Research & Insights

Don’t Listen. (It Might Be Good For You.)

  • October 2, 2014
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

Ever wonder why your best-intended and undoubtedly thoughtful communications efforts to get people to change their ways—like adopt more healthy behavior—seem to be hitting a wall?

It could be that even if your messages are reaching your target audiences, your audience is purposefully avoiding doing what you’re telling them to do.

According to researchers at the University of Florida, when it comes to getting people to do things differently—especially if it requires them to change behaviors they do not want to—they become like ostriches with their heads in the sand.

“People sometimes manage threatening information by proactively avoiding it,” write Jennifer Howell and James Shepperd, psychologists at the University of Florida, in the 2013 issue of the Annals of Behavioral Medicine.

To learn why people avoid information that’s meant to be beneficial, Howell and Shepperd asked undergraduate students to participate in a variety of medical tests to learn their risk factor for a fictitious disease. They found that when students were told that receiving the results would result in having to undergo long, invasive, or unpleasant therapies–like taking medication for the rest of their lives–fewer wanted to know what their risks were. The researchers found that “across all studies, participants more often avoided feedback when it could obligate highly undesirable behavior compared with mildly undesirable behavior.”

Howell and Shepperd attribute this response to autonomy – what the researchers describe as people’s need to be in control of their lives and free of obligation to make changes. In other words, it’s better not to know something if the price of knowing threatens their ability to be in control of their lives

“Because a sense of autonomy is such a central aspect of the self, people naturally react defensively to threats to their autonomy,” Howell and Shepperd say. “[P]eople often respond to messages they perceive as constraining their behavior by behaving in ways that are directly counter to the message.”

In short, people avoid information that obligates them to make a change or take action that they do not want to make–even if it is in their best interest.

So the next time you plan a campaign, think about what you are asking people to do and try to find a way that doesn’t make them feel threatened.

Annals of Behavioral Medicine, April 2013

Researchers:
Jennifer L. Howell and James A. Shepperd, University of Florida

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • frankology
Previous Article
  • Research & Insights

Even Farmers Suffering From Drought Think Global Warming Science Is All Wet

  • August 29, 2014
View Post
Next Article
  • Research & Insights

Science, Environmental Journalists Warming To New Notions Of “Objectivity”

  • October 21, 2014
View Post
Professional Development
  • Science Communications Course 
  • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
More of our work
  • How to Build Better Calls to Action
  • Finding the Right Messenger for Your Message
  • Why Intersectional Stories Are Key to Helping the Communities We Serve
  • Illustration by Ailadi
    Outsmart Gender Bias through Design
Latest from the Center
  • Most Americans Support Freedom of Information. Almost None Have Ever Used It.
  • October 2025 nationwide survey sheds light on Americans’ increasing worry about housing affordability
  • 2025 ‘Real Good Census’ Reveals a Strategically Vital Field with Strong Rewards, Marking Significant Growth
  • composite image of Audrey Goldfarb and text stating "Science isn't personal: why communicating emotion isn't 'soft,' it's strategic"
    Changemakers in Action: Dr. Audrey Goldfarb
How We Help – Case Studies
  • Council on Foundations - Largest study on narratives about philanthropy
    Largest Study on Narratives About Philanthropy with the Council on Foundations
  • hands with medicine
    Invest in Trust – a vaccine communications guide for CNAs
  • gloved hand holding vial
    Science-based communication strategy on COVID for the UN Verified Initiative
UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2026

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.