• About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
  • Research & Insights

Does Believing in a “Fair” System Stall Social Movements?

  • December 14, 2015
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

A new study has some surprising findings about the connection between the belief that we can change the political system and our willingness to mobilize. It turns out that – for minority groups in New Zealand, at least – feeling like the system is open to change may make them less supportive of social movements designed to advocate for their needs.

Conducted by researchers Danny Obsborne, Kumar Yogeeswaran and Chris G. Sibley and published in a 2015 issue of the journal Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, the study involved 399 Māori participants. The Māori are an indigenous minority group in New Zealand, and – like minority groups in many countries – face significant socioeconomic challenges, such as increased unemployment and disproportionate incarceration.

The researchers analyzed data from nationwide surveys of political attitudes conducted in New Zealand. They focused especially on measures of political efficacy – the feeling that people can change the system – and feelings that the system is fair. Efficacy, for instance, was measured in terms of agreement with statements such as, “The average citizen can have an influence on government decisions.” System justification – the idea that the system is fair and open to change – was measured with statements such as, “In general, I find New Zealand society to be fair” and “Most of New Zealand’s policies serve the greater good.”

Māori participants were also asked how much they support mobilization activities to protect the Māori community. For example, participants were asked how much they supported “[p]rotest marches and public demonstrations supporting the rights of Māori,” and whether they believed that “Māori have too much political power and influence in decisions affecting New Zealand.”

The researchers found an unexpected link between feelings of political efficacy and support for mobilization. Rather than feeling empowered to mobilize when they felt more efficacy, participants who had high levels of efficacy were instead less supportive of activism on behalf of Māori people.

A feeling that the system was fair provides the link between these two attitudes. “[P]olitical efficacy (i.e., believing that the system is malleable)…indirectly undermine[s] people’s political mobilization support by increasing minority group members’ belief that the system is just,” the researchers explain.

“[S]ystem-justifying beliefs [such as the belief that society is just] help maintain the status quo by dampening the blow of inequality and by reducing the total effect that political efficacy has on disadvantaged group members’ political mobilization support.”

Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology

Researchers:
Danny Osborne and Chris G. Sibley, University of Auckland
Kumar Yogeeswaran, University of Canterbury

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • frankology
Previous Article
  • Research & Insights

Make It Personal: Identifying with a Charity May Increase Donations

  • December 9, 2015
View Post
Next Article
  • Research & Insights

6 Simple Steps to Understanding Your Audiences Through Research

  • December 15, 2015
View Post
Professional Development
  • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
  • Science Communications Course 
More of our work
  • To Win Against False Information, We Must Play Offense
  • Changing Mindsets, Changing the Rules
  • Photo by -slav-
    This Untapped Tool Could Help Boost Vaccination Rates
  • The Science of Story Building
Latest from the Center
  • Most Americans Support Freedom of Information. Almost None Have Ever Used It.
  • October 2025 nationwide survey sheds light on Americans’ increasing worry about housing affordability
  • 2025 ‘Real Good Census’ Reveals a Strategically Vital Field with Strong Rewards, Marking Significant Growth
  • composite image of Audrey Goldfarb and text stating "Science isn't personal: why communicating emotion isn't 'soft,' it's strategic"
    Changemakers in Action: Dr. Audrey Goldfarb
How We Help – Case Studies
  • illustration
    Innovation Service of UNHCR: the UN Refugee Agency
  • hands with medicine
    Invest in Trust – a vaccine communications guide for CNAs
  • florida beach
    When the Science Stops at the Shoreline: Sharing Research on Florida’s Red Tide
UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2026

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.