• About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
Center for Public Interest Communications
Support
  • About
    • About the Center for Public Interest Communications
    • What is Public Interest Communications?
    • Our Team
    • Theories We Use
    • Center Updates
    • Programs & Affiliates
      • frank gathering
      • The Research Prize in Public Interest Communications
      • Journal of Public Interest Communications
      • UF Programs
    • Our Approach to Generative Artificial Intelligence
    • Contact Us
    • Job: Center Research Assistant
  • SOLUTIONS
    • Beyond Raising Awareness
    • Become a Great Science Communicator
    • Fixing Data’s Demand Problem
    • Why your narrative change strategy isn’t working
    • How to reach people who don’t already agree with you
    • Why Your Science Communication Isn’t Landing
    • Services
      • Strategy Consulting
      • Issue Research
      • Training – Frameworks and Custom
  • Frameworks
  • Training
    • Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Learn on your schedule
      • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
      • Science Communications Course 
      • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
  • RESOURCES
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletter
    • Scholarship & Publications
  • Research & Insights

Flipping The Switch For Alternative-energy Power Plans

  • August 12, 2015
  • 2 minute read
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0
0

Encouraging people to choose an environmentally-friendly energy plan is a tough sell, especially when eco-friendly power typically carries a higher price tag. But research from the University of Mannheim in Mannheim, Germany and the Universitat Pompeu Fabra in Barcelona, Spain, suggests that people are likely to select an eco-friendly plan if that’s offered as the default choice and conventional power is a second as second option.

For their study, which is published in the August 2014 issue of Energy Policy, researchers Katharina Momsen and Thomas Stoerk examined whether “nudges” — “a slight change in the information set that an individual faces when taking an action” – can encourage consumers to enroll in an alternative-energy power plan. Their study involved 475 European college students..

In the experiment, students were asked to imagine that they had just moved to a new apartment and had to choose between two alternative energy plans. The first plan was “100% conventional energy, priced at 30€ per month.” The second plan was “50% renewable energy / 50% conventional energy, priced at 45€ per month.” The students were subject to a variety of experimental “nudges” designed to encourage them to choose the renewable plan.

For instance, some of the students were informed that the renewable plan produced fewer carbon dioxide emissions than the conventional plan. Other students were told that “the majority of [their] neighbors uses an energy mix that features 50% renewable energy.” Still other students were told that “the default energy contract in their region consists of 50% renewable energy and 50% conventional energy,” such that, while they could choose between the two plans, “if they [did] not make an active choice…they [would] keep the default contract and use renewable energy.”

The researchers found that “only the default nudge had a significant effect,” raising the number of participants selecting the renewable energy package from 48.2% to 69.7%. Although the researchers caution that “the magnitude of the effect in our survey experiment does not directly translate into real world applications, we believe that the direction of the effect can be trusted.”

“Public actors,” the researchers note, “could use our findings to consider the implementation of default renewable energy contracts as an alternative way of promoting renewable energies.”

Energy Policy

Researchers:
Katharina Momsen, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
Thomas Stoerk, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Share 0
Related Topics
  • frankology
Previous Article
  • Research & Insights

Research Says Anti-smoking Campaigns Should Target Social Media

  • August 10, 2015
View Post
Next Article
  • Research & Insights

6 Ways To Use Emotion In Your Campaigns, According To Research

  • August 13, 2015
View Post
Professional Development
  • Science Communications Course 
  • Beyond raising awareness: How to create lasting change
  • Strategic Communications Academy for UF Leaders & Scholars
More of our work
  • Photo by -slav-
    This Untapped Tool Could Help Boost Vaccination Rates
  • The Science of Belief: Identify Perceptions of Harm
  • Photo by Klaus Nielsen:
    How to Use Stories to Bring ‘Us’ and ‘Them’ Together
  • Illustration by Ailadi
    Communicating Complexity in the Humanitarian Sector
Latest from the Center
  • Most Americans Support Freedom of Information. Almost None Have Ever Used It.
  • October 2025 nationwide survey sheds light on Americans’ increasing worry about housing affordability
  • 2025 ‘Real Good Census’ Reveals a Strategically Vital Field with Strong Rewards, Marking Significant Growth
  • composite image of Audrey Goldfarb and text stating "Science isn't personal: why communicating emotion isn't 'soft,' it's strategic"
    Changemakers in Action: Dr. Audrey Goldfarb
How We Help – Case Studies
  • hands with medicine
    Invest in Trust – a vaccine communications guide for CNAs
  • Staff professional development via ‘drip’ training integrated in Slack
  • Council on Foundations - Largest study on narratives about philanthropy
    Largest Study on Narratives About Philanthropy with the Council on Foundations
UF Logo

Center for Public Interest Communications
PO Box 118400
Gainesville, FL 32611-8400

An auxiliary unit of the College of Journalism and Communications

Copyright © 2026

Contact Us

We are eager to chat with you about your project or training need.

Send us a note

The Center for Public Interest Communications, the first of its kind in the nation, is designed to study, test and apply the science of strategic communication for change. We are based at the University of Florida College of Journalism and Communications.

  • Change Communication
  • Science Communication
  • Strategic Communication
  • Broader Impacts
  • Public Interest Communication
  • Narrative Change
  • Leadership Development
  • Strategy Development
  • Effective Presentations
  • Research Translation & Insights

Input your search keywords and press Enter.